Dean Luthey and Trent Shores Discuss the “Aftermath of the McGirt Decision” at IEL’s Energy Law Conference

GableGotwals’s Trent Shores, a former United States Attorney, and Dean Luthey, chair of the Firm’s Native American Law section and a senior trial lawyer, discuss the impact of the Supreme Court’s McGirt decision on criminal and civil jurisdiction in Eastern Oklahoma. From unique considerations for the energy industry to working with tribal governments, the McGirt decision presents both opportunities and questions for oil and gas entities.

By |2022-03-28T11:14:12-05:00February 28th, 2022|Comments Off on Dean Luthey and Trent Shores Discuss the “Aftermath of the McGirt Decision” at IEL’s Energy Law Conference

GableGotwals Shareholders Participate in Judicial Conference

Two GableGotwals shareholders recently spoke to the Oklahoma Judicial Conference at its annual meeting on topics requested by the conference organizers. Dean Luthey, along with Court of Civil Appeals Judge Stacie Hixon, gave a presentation on court awarded attorney fees. Trent Shores participated on a panel that included tribal Attorneys General regarding the United States Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. State of Oklahoma, holding that the Muscogee Nation’s historical reservation had not been disestablished.

By |2021-09-28T15:42:01-05:00August 30th, 2021|Comments Off on GableGotwals Shareholders Participate in Judicial Conference

Oklahoma Jury Finds for Range Resources and Rejects Plaintiff’s Royalty Underpayment Claims

On March 25, 2019, a jury in Anadarko, Oklahoma, issued a unanimous verdict in favor of Range Resources Corporation (Range), rejecting claims by 11 plaintiffs that Range had underpaid their royalties. The plaintiffs had opted out of an earlier class action settlement and brought individual claims alleging Range had underpaid royalties on gas production from 13 different wells. Range maintained it had properly paid royalties on the proceeds received by it from selling the gas production at or near the wells to various third-party purchasers under percentage-of-proceeds or percentage-of-index contracts, and that the gas was a marketable product when so sold. Typical of many cases making similar claims, plaintiffs contended the percentage-of-proceeds and percentage-of-index sales were disguised “service” agreements, and that the gas was not marketable until after it was processed at the buyers’ downstream processing plants. Following a two-week trial, the Court submitted the case to the jury on plaintiffs’ claims of breach of lease, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. The jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of Range and against all plaintiffs on all claims.

By |2024-05-31T14:10:46-05:00March 25th, 2019|Comments Off on Oklahoma Jury Finds for Range Resources and Rejects Plaintiff’s Royalty Underpayment Claims
Go to Top