Each candidate is evaluated on 12 indicators of peer recognition and professional achievement, and selections are made on an annual, state-by-state basis.
The recent flurry of activity regarding tariffs and the resultant market volatility should have public companies reviewing and analyzing their risk factors and MD&A sections in the preparation of their upcoming 10-Q filings for the first quarter.
The CTA and its implementing regulations have created a number of new risks and responsibilities. We understand the difficulty in sorting through these new requirements, let alone complying with them. This Alert provides guidance for public companies.
Each candidate is evaluated on 12 indicators of peer recognition and professional achievement, and selections are made on an annual, state-by-state basis.
Assisted with the company formation, drafting offering documents to raise capital, reviewed the U.S. and worldwide distribution agreements, and negotiated contracts with actors and crew for two feature-length films “Prodigy” and “Under The Influencer.”
Jeff Haughey, a member of GableGotwals’ Sports, Media, and Entertainment Practice, assisted with the company formation, drafting offering documents to raise capital, reviewed the U.S. and worldwide distribution agreements, and negotiated contracts with actors and crew for two feature-length films “Prodigy” and “Under The Influencer.”
For more than 35 years, GableGotwals attorneys have been advising clients in the sports, media, and entertainment sectors. The team’s unique market insights inform our advice to digital, media, and production companies, entertainment venues, professional and collegiate athletes, musicians, actors, filmmakers, celebrities, licensors/rights holders, investors, financiers, and business owners.
On October 31, 2023, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Fifth Circuit”) held in Chamber of Commerce of the USA v. SEC, that when the SEC adopted the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rule (the “Repurchase Rule”), the “SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously, in violation of the APA, when it failed to respond to the petitioners’ comments and failed to conduct a proper cost-benefit analysis.”
