The publication, which has been a staple of the legal community since 1987, is the go-to resource for lawyers and judges engaged in Oklahoma civil litigation.
GableGotwals is pleased to announce that 74 lawyers have been recognized in the 2024 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America, four of which were newly included, and seven newly named on the "Ones to Watch" list. In addition, eight GableGotwals attorneys were named 2024 "Lawyer of the Year."
Associates Scott Kiplinger and Taylor J. Peshehonoff and Shareholder Jake Krattiger were recently recognized at the Federal Bar Association’s (FBA) Judicial Reception for their “exceptional service and outstanding performance” on behalf of the FBA’s Pro Bono 2022-2023 Program.
Acted as local counsel for defendant Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.in a successful motion to dismiss a personal injury suit in the Western District Court of Oklahoma regarding a lithium-ion battery used in an e-cigarette allegedly exploded in the plaintiff’s pocket and caused injuries.
Adam Doverspike and Scott Kiplinger acted as local counsel for defendant Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.in this victorious motion to dismiss a personal injury suit in the Western District Court of Oklahoma.
Congratulations to Scott Kiplinger and Ashlyn Smith who were recently recognized for their pro bono services to the Federal Bar Association and to Jake Krattiger who was named Outstanding Board Member for the 2020-2021 year.
CMS issued an emergency regulation requiring COVID-19 vaccination of staff at Medicare- and Medicaid-certified healthcare facilities.
GableGotwals obtained summary judgment for a University in the District Court of Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma. The University was sued for terminating a service contract with a vendor. The University counter-claimed for declaratory relief on grounds that it properly terminated the contract. District Judge Don Andrews held the vendor was in material breach of the parties’ service contract and the University’s termination was justified under the contract’s terms. Further, the Court held that the University did not tortiously interfere with the vendor and that the vendor was not entitled to an equitable accounting.
